privileged selves and that we don't care about women, LGBT people, or about sick or old people because Obama got us something that FDR and LBJ couldn't get us together (although it hasn't completely started yet, but you just wait and see cause when it does it will be awesome and even though it isn't great it was the best he could do and ignore that he didn't try anything better, so there, also ponies). Even Firedoglake (if you count Tbogg). Although in reality Firedoglake or at least the front page seems to be kind of skitsofrantic (which appears to be the way that word is really spelled, who knew?) what with one or another front pager posting things about the awful stuff Obama does and then the ones just before and after them talking about how much worse things will be if Romney gets in.
When serious matters are raised: the drone attacks, Obama's attempt to crush dissent, the burgeoning police state, the gifts to Wall Street, and the Cat Food Commission, among other things. We are told that Romney is going to be a disaster and Obama did many nearly great things: ACA, the end of DADT, and his refusal to defend the Defense of Marriage Act. Most of these good things don't involve money being removed from the pockets of the wealthy, in fact I don't think any of the wonderful things Obama has done involved redistributing money in any direction except towards the wealthy. So my deal breakers are not good enough, but theirs are.
Interestingly enough, there seems to be a lot of reliance on certain of Obama's campaign "promises or statements," but not all. The very same thing they make fun of me for what they say I did back in 2008. Although I didn't. I was just scared of Sarah Palin and didn't think that Obama could be this reactionary and politically incompetent. As an aside how can the first African American elected president be so politically incompetent?
So any way Obama has done great things for women's rights (or at least he hasn't gutted them like Romney says he will do) and LGBT rights, after he was dragged kicking and screaming into the positions he finally, kind of, took. And, and what then? A "stimulus" that was one of every four dollars as tax breaks to the wealthy, something I suspect the republican would have been forced into in one form or another. A bail out of Wall Street to save our banks something we know the republican would have been happy to do and would have done. The use of the feds to crack down of medical marijuana and whistle blowers, I wonder if there is anyone who thinks that the republican would have done it differently?
Past is prologue. What will probably be the main domestic goal will be to deal with the deficit with cuts to spending with "everything on the table." Including things like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. So where does that leave us?
Damned if I know, no that isn't true. I do think that I know. Unfortunately choosing between Mr. Plutocrat and Mr. I Am A Happy Employee Of The Plutocracy doesn't strike me as much of a choice.
Updated in a couple of places to remove the incoherent parts, I hope.